Effectiveness of Green Mussel (Perna viridis) and PAC in Reducing TSS and Turbidity in River Water

Zakkiyah Sabrina (1), Aussie Amalia (2), Restu Hikmah Ayu Murti (3)
(1) Environmental Engineering Department, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur, Surabaya. Indonesia
(2) Environmental Engineering Department, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur, Surabaya. Indonesia
(3) Environmental Engineering Department, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur, Surabaya. Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (AJARCDE) :
Sabrina, Z., Amalia, A., & Murti, R. H. A. (2025). Effectiveness of Green Mussel (Perna viridis) and PAC in Reducing TSS and Turbidity in River Water . AJARCDE (Asian Journal of Applied Research for Community Development and Empowerment), 9(3), 215–219. https://doi.org/10.29165/ajarcde.v9i3.819

Contamination of river water by suspended particles and organic matter increases total suspended solids (TSS) and turbidity, degrading water quality and posing risks to aquatic ecosystems and public health. This study evaluated the performance of chitosan derived from green mussel shells (Perna viridis) compared to polyaluminium chloride (PAC), a conventional coagulant, in reducing TSS and turbidity. Chitosan was selected due to its cationic polymer properties, which are obtained through the conversion of chitin, enhancing its coagulation–flocculation effectiveness. The experiment employed a jar test with variations in pH (5, 7, and 9), coagulant dosage, and standardized mixing protocols. Results showed that chitosan achieved optimal performance at pH 5 with a 150 mg/L dosage, resulting in 82% TSS removal and 87% turbidity reduction. In contrast, PAC performed best at pH 7 with a 20 mg/L dosage, achieving 85% TSS removal and 87% turbidity reduction. Particle Size Analyzer (PSA) results indicated that PAC produced larger and more uniform flocs (Xav = 1796.71 nm; PI = 0.403) compared to chitosan (Xav = 1070.28 nm; PI = 0.444). Although PAC had slightly higher efficiency, chitosan from mussel shell waste shows strong potential as an environmentally friendly coagulant for treating river water.


Contribution to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs):
SDG 6: Clean Water and Sanitation
SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities


 

[1] Adjovu, G. E., Stephen, S. H., Adjovu, J. D., & Ahmad, A. (2023). Measurement of Total Dissolved Solids and Total Suspended Solids in Water Systems: A Review of the Issues, Conventional, and Remote Sensing Techniques. Remote Sensing, 15(14), 3534. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15143534

[2] Aljohani, H. M., Alshareef, S. A., Alhashmialameer, D., Alrashidi, A. A., Alatawi, N. M., & Hatamleh, A. A. (2024). A Review of Chitosan-Based Materials for Biomedical, Food, and Water Treatment Applications. Polymers, 16(23), 3395. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16233395

[3] Ang, W. L., & Glatz, B. (2020). Particle Size Analysis and Characterization of Coagulation–Flocculation Process: A Review. Water Science and Technology, 81(9), 1759–1770.

[4] Ang, W. L., & Mohammad, A. W. (2020). State of the Art and Sustainability of Natural Coagulants in Water and Wastewater Treatment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 262, 121267.

[5] Ang, W. L., & Glatz, B. (2020). Particle Size Analysis and Characterization of Coagulation–Flocculation Process: A Review. Water Science and Technology, 81(9), 1759–1770.

[6] Huang, S., Chen, X., & Lin, Q. (2023). Biofiltration performance of green mussel (Perna viridis) in marine aquaculture wastewater treatment. Aquaculture Engineering, 103, 102356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2023.102356

[7] Kristianto, H., Paulina, S., & Soetedjo, J. N. M. (2018). Pengaruh pH terhadap Efektivitas Poly Aluminium Chloride (PAC) dalam Menurunkan Kekeruhan Air Gambut. Jurnal Teknik Kimia, 12(2), 45–52.

[8] Liu, H., & Wang, J. (2024). Advances in polyaluminum chloride coagulation for water treatment: Mechanisms and applications. Chemical Engineering Journal, 479, 147652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.147652

[9] Mahmoud, A., Hoadley, A. F. A., Conrardy, J. B., Seiber, J. N., & Pyle, S. M. (2021). A Review of Natural Coagulants for Enhanced Turbidity Removal and Pathogen Inactivation in Water Treatment. Journal of Water and Health, 19(4), 551–577. https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2021.094

[10] Mohd Nasir, N. A., Abdul Manan, Z., & Alwi, S. R. W. (2022). Correlation analysis of water quality parameters in tropical river systems. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 194(8), 573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661022-10234-5

[11] Nimesha, S., Hewawasam, C., & Jayasanka, D. J. (2022). Effectiveness of natural coagulants in water and wastewater treatment. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 8(1), 101-116. https://doi.org/10.22034/gjesm.2022.01.08

[12] Rajagopal, S., Venugopalan, V. P., & Nair, K. V. K. (2019). Filtration and biofouling potential of tropical marine bivalves: Implications for water quality management. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 145, 285-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.05.043

[13] Sharma, P., Singh, R., & Kumar, A. (2021). Optimization of polyaluminum chloride coagulation for turbidity and suspended solids removal from river water. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 9(4), 105679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.105679

[14] Trisnawati, I., & Suherman. (2020). Perbandingan Efektivitas Kitosan dan PAC dalam Penurunan Turbiditas Air Gambut. Jurnal Teknologi Lingkungan, 21(1), 67–74.

[15] Yang, Z., Li, M., Yu, M., Huang, J., Xu, H., Zhou, Y., Song, P., & Xu, R. (2020). Characteristics and Mechanism of Chitosan in Flocculation for Water Coagulation in the Yellow River Diversion Reservoir. International Journal of Environmental Research, 14(3), 325–335.

[16] Zhang, Y., Shi, K., Liu, X., Zhou, Y., & Qin, B. (2014). Lake topography and wind waves determining seasonal spatial dynamics of total suspended matter in turbid Lake Taihu, China: Assessment using long-term high resolution MERIS data. PLoS ONE, 9(5), e98055. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098055

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.