Electrocoagulation Technology Based on Aluminum–Zinc Electrodes as an Environmentally Friendly Method for the Removal of Cr3+ and Cd2+ from Batik Wastewater

Sani Sani (1), Sherina Tri Syopianti (2), Delia Shelamita Prasetya (3), Ika Nawang Puspitawati (4)
(1) Department of Chemical Engineering, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Surabaya 60294, Indonesia.
(2) Department of Chemical Engineering, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Surabaya 60294, Indonesia.
(3) Department of Chemical Engineering, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Surabaya 60294, Indonesia.
(4) Department of Chemical Engineering, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Surabaya 60294, Indonesia.
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (AJARCDE) :
Sani, S., Syopianti, S. T., Prasetya, D. S., & Puspitawati, I. N. (2026). Electrocoagulation Technology Based on Aluminum–Zinc Electrodes as an Environmentally Friendly Method for the Removal of Cr3+ and Cd2+ from Batik Wastewater. AJARCDE (Asian Journal of Applied Research for Community Development and Empowerment), 10(1), 295–300. https://doi.org/10.29165/ajarcde.v10i1.945

Industrial batik wastewater often contains elevated concentrations of heavy metals, particularly Cr3+ and Cd2+, which pose serious risks to aquatic environments due to their toxicity, persistence, and non-biodegradable nature. Effective treatment technologies are therefore essential. Electrocoagulation represents a promising approach, as it is a redox-based process that employs the electrolytic dissolution of Al–Zn electrodes to generate in situ aluminum hydroxide coagulants. These coagulants effectively adsorb, destabilise, and precipitate dissolved heavy metal ions. This study evaluates the effects of applied voltage and electrolysis time on the performance of the electrocoagulation process for heavy metal removal from batik wastewater under batch conditions. Experiments were conducted at voltages ranging from 10 to 50 V, electrolysis times of 80–160 minutes, and an electrode spacing of 2 cm. Optimal performance was achieved at 50 V and 160 minutes, reducing Cr3+ concentrations from 3.78 mg/L to 0.031 mg/L, Cd2+ from 2.55 mg/L to 0.021 mg/L, and total suspended solids (TSS) from 203.77 mg/L to 39 mg/L. These findings demonstrate that electrocoagulation offers significant advantages, including in situ coagulant generation without external chemical addition, formation of stable flocs, and high efficiency in separating heavy metal contaminants.


Contribution to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs):
SDG 6: Clean Water and Sanitation
SDG 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
SDG 12: Responsible Consumption and Production

[1] S. Nasional, W. Indonesia, J. Ptbb, and F. T. Uny, “Seminar Nasional 2011 ‘Wonderful Indonesia’ Jurusan PTBB FT UNY, 3 Desember 2011 1,” pp. 1–15, 2011.

[2] P. Kharisma Subagyo, “Pengaruh Zat Pewarna Sintetis terhadap Pewarnaan Kain Batik,” J. Fash. Prod. Des. Bus., vol. 2, pp. 44–46, 2021.

[3] F. Fitriyah, T. Akbari, and I. Alfandiana, “Pengolahan Limbah Cair Batik Banten secara Koagulasi Menggunakan Tawas dan Adsorpsi dengan Memanfaatkan Zeolit Alam Bayah,” J. Serambi Eng., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 2499–2509, 2021, doi: 10.32672/jse.v7i1.3705.

[4] Y. Dhokhikah, N. Pramitasari, F. L. Fitria, and S. R. Sheikh, “JUARA?: Jurnal Wahana Abdimas Sejahtera PENINGKATAN PENGETAHUAN ANGGOTA ASOSIASI KERAJINAN BATIK DI KABUPATEN JEMBER , JAWA TIMUR TENTANG PENGOLAHAN AIR LIMBAH INDUSTRI BATIK The Knowledge Improvement of The East Java Batik Craft Association Members in Je,” pp. 197–205, 2020.

[5] L. Dini, R. A. Kusumadewi, and R. Hadisoebroto, “ADSORPSI LOGAM BERAT KROM (Cr) DAN ZAT WARNA DENGAN ADSORBEN KULIT PISANG KEPOK DALAM AIR LIMBAH BATIK,” J. Reka Lingkung., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 37–48, 2023, doi: 10.26760/rekalingkungan.v11i1.37-48.

[6] D. Deliza, A. Syukri, M. N. Wulanda, and D. Sartika, “Detection of metal elements within Inductively Couple Plasma Emission Jambi batik waste and views as Muslim education,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1869, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1869/1/012059.

[7] M. Balali-Mood, K. Naseri, Z. Tahergorabi, M. R. Khazdair, and M. Sadeghi, “Toxic Mechanisms of Five Heavy Metals: Mercury, Lead, Chromium, Cadmium, and Arsenic,” Front. Pharmacol., vol. 12, no. April, pp. 1–19, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.643972.

[8] H. Wei, Y. Rao, J. Liu, Y. Wang, and Y. Cao, “Impact on urban river water quality and pollution control of water environmental management projects based on SMS ? Mike21 coupled simulation,” Sci. Rep., pp. 1–12, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57201-z.

[9] ?. Pikna, M. Heželová, D. Remeteiová, S. Ruži?ková, R. Findorák, and J. Brian?in, “A Comprehensive View of the Optimization of Chromium (VI) Processing through the Application of Electrocoagulation Using a Pair of Steel Electrodes,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 16, no. 8, 2023, doi: 10.3390/ma16083027.

[10] O. A. Djamaludin, “Penyisihan Cod (Chemical Oxygen Demand) Dan Warna Pada Pengolahan Limbah Cair Ikm Batik Menggunakan Alat Elektrokoagulasi,” Texere, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 36–44, 2022, doi: 10.53298/texere.v20i1.04.

[11] E. B. Agustina and A. H. P. Yuniarto, “Study of BOD, COD and TSS Removal in Batik Industry Wastewater using Electrocoagulation Method,” JKPK (Jurnal Kim. dan Pendidik. Kim., vol. 7, no. 2, p. 150, 2022, doi: 10.20961/jkpk.v7i2.59977.

[12] J. Smajic, A. Alazmi, N. Wehbe, and P. M. F. J. Costa, “Electrode–electrolyte interactions in an aqueous aluminum–carbon rechargeable battery system,” Nanomaterials, vol. 11, no. 12, 2021, doi: 10.3390/nano11123235.

[13] G. Jayamaha, L. Tegg, C. L. Bentley, and M. Kang, “High Throughput Correlative Electrochemistry-Microscopy Analysis on a Zn-Al Alloy,” ACS Phys. Chem. Au, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 375–384, 2024, doi: 10.1021/acsphyschemau.4c00016.

[14] M. Desyderia and A. M. D. S. Aman Sentosa Panggabean, “DECREASING OF COD AND TSS FROM LAUNDRY WASTE USES ALUMINUM (Al) AND COPPER (Cu) ELECTRODES IN THE ELECTROCOAGULATION METHOD,” J. Kim. Mulawarman, vol. 18, no. 2, p. 84, 2021, doi: 10.30872/jkm.v18i2.737.

[15] R. T. Doumbi, J. O. Kowe, Domga, D. weldi Gnowe, and G. B. Noumi, “The influence of cathodic materials and optimization of the removal of the chromium (VI) from tannery wastewater by electrocoagulation,” Clean. Water, vol. 2, no. June, p. 100032, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.clwat.2024.100032.

[16] J. Fadzli, S. W. Puasa, N. R. Nik Him, K. H. Ku Hamid, and N. Amri, “Electrocoagulation: Removing colour and COD from simulated and actual batik wastewater,” Desalin. Water Treat., vol. 320, no. July, p. 100658, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.dwt.2024.100658.

[17] D. Metode, E. Menggunakan, A. H. K. Oharruddin, V. I. N. A. A. Malia, and D. A. N. T. E. T. Y. S. Udiarti, “Elektroda Aluminium Dan Karbon,” vol. 6, no. 1, 2019.

[18] M. Alameen, “Removal of Cadmium from Industrial Wastewater using Electrocoagulation Process,” vol. 26, no. 1, 2020.

[19] E. Ningsih, Y. W. Mirzayanti, A. C. Ni’am, and D. A. F. dan M. A. Imami, “ELEKTROKOAGULASI LIMBAH INDUSTRI SARUNG TENUN DENGAN ELEKTRODA Al-Zn DISUSUN SERI,” Din. Kerajinan dan Batik Maj. Ilm., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 67–76, 2022, doi: 10.22322/dkb.V36i1.4149.

[20] E. B. Agustina, A. H. P. Yuniarto, D. A. Rachman, and A. T. Dewi, “Pengaruh Jarak Elektroda dan Waktu Terhadap Kandungan COD dan TSS Menggunakan Metode Filtrasi-Elektrokoagulasi pada Pengolahan Limbah Batik,” Lontar Phys. Today, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 45–50, 2022, doi: 10.26877/lpt.v1i1.10669.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.