Comparative Effectiveness of Roundabouts and Traffic Signals as Alternative Treatments for Unsignalized Intersections under Projected Traffic Growth (A Case Study of the Wadung Asri–Brebek–Gedong Masjid Intersection, Sidoarjo Regency.)
How to cite (AJARCDE) :
Unsignalized intersections are vulnerable to performance degradation as traffic volume increases, particularly at the Wadung Asri–Brebek–Gedong Masjid Intersection in Sidoarjo Regency. This study aims to analyze the intersection performance based on the 2023 Indonesian Highway Capacity Guidelines (PKJI 2023) and compare the effectiveness of a roundabout and a signalized intersection (APILL) as alternative treatments under projected traffic growth. The research method involved manual traffic surveys conducted over four days during peak hours, including traffic volume and intersection geometric data. The results show that the existing condition has a degree of saturation (DS) of 0.88 with an average delay of 15.16 s/SMP. Based on the traffic projection for the design year of 2030, the DS increases to 1.11, with an average delay of 26.08 s/SMP, indicating that the intersection does not meet the PKJI 2023 standard (DS < 0.85). The first treatment involved geometric widening of each intersection approach and designing a roundabout, resulting in a DS of 1.07 and an average delay of 52.00 s/SMP. The second treatment involved geometric widening of each intersection approach and the design of a four-phase signalized intersection, resulting in a DS of 0.79 and an average delay of 51.80 s/SMP. Therefore, geometric widening combined with a four-phase signalized intersection is recommended as the preferred treatment alternative because it achieves a DS that meets the PKJI 2023 standard, with a relatively comparable delay to the roundabout alternative.
Contribution to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs):
SDG 9 : Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure
SDG 11 : Sustainable Urban Mobility
SDG 13 : Climate Action
[1] S. Yuniarti dan L. Wananda, “Analisis Kinerja Simpang Tiga Tak Bersinyal (Studi Kasus : Simpang Pall Jl. Raya Jakarta-Bogor-Akses UI),” Jurnal Teknik Sipil-Arsitektur, vol. I, no. 24, pp. 1-6, 2025.
[2] M. R. Ramzy, B. Rahardjo dan B. Supriyanto, “Analisis KIinerja Simpang Bersinyal di Kota Malang Menggunakan PKJI 2023 (Studi Kasus: SIimpang Dieng Malang),” Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi dan Edukasi Teknik, no. 4, 2024.
[3] S. A. Adha, R. E. WIbisono, M. A. Sabrina dan O. E. Putri, “Evaluasi Kinerja Lalu Lintas Simpang Tak Bersinyal Jalan Pulo Wonokromo Kota Surabaya Menggunakan Metode Kapasitas Jalan Indonesia 2023,” Mitrans, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 383-391, 2023.
[4] J. Prananta dan Judiono, “Analisa Kinerja Simpang Tak Bersinyal dan Alternatif Penanganannya Studi Kasus: Simpang Tiga Kahuripan, Jalan Jati Raya Kabupaten Sidoarjo,” Portal, vol. 2, no. 16, pp. 157 - 164, 2024.
[5] M. Syaifullah, Y. Kadir dan F. L. Desei, “Kinerja Simpang Empat Tak Bersinyal Menggunakan Metode PKJI 2023 dan Software VISSIM,” Konstruksia, vol. 2, no. 15, pp. 147-163, 2024.
[6] E. Nemers dan W. Boy, “Analisis Konfik Lalu Lintas Simpang Tak Bersinyal (Studi Kasus : Simpang 3 Parak Gadang, Kota Padang),” Rivet, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 54-65, 2024.
[7] D. Khoirotunni'mah, K. H. Putra dan T. M. C. Agusdin, “Kinerja Simpang Bersinyal dengan Metode PKJI 2023 dan MKJI 1997 pada Simpang Tiga Jalan Raya Mastrip, Wiyung, Surabaya,” Talenta Sipil, vol. 1, no. 8, pp. 50-59, 2025.
[8] A. Maitimu, V. A. Korytelu dan H. Tahya, “Analisis Kinerja Simpang Tak Bersinyal Di Ruas Jalan Dr. Malaihollo Kota Ambon,” Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Bangsa, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 595-607, 2024.
[9] Y. F. Pramu, N. Hartatik dan D. A. Safitri, “Analisi Kinerja Simpang Bersinyal ( Studi Kasus Jl. Manyar Kertoarjo - Jl Kertajaya - Jl. Raya Menur, Kota Surabaya),” Journal of Scientech Research and Development, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 497-504, 2024.
[10] D. F. F. Desanta, I. Solichin dan F. Estikhamah, “Analisis Kinerja Simpang Tidak Bersinyal Jalan Menganti-Jalan Sepat-Jalan Wisma Lidah Kulon Kota Surabaya Menggunakan Metode PKJI 2023,” Agregat, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 1109-1116, 2024.
[11] M. Ridwan, E. Kurniati dan Hermansyah, “Analisa Kinerja Bundaran Pada Simpang Cabang Banggo, Kecamatan Manggalewa, Kabupaten Dompu,” J-Central, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 6-13, 2024.
[12] E. P. Sari, Robby dan Murniati, “Analisis Volume Lalu Lintas Pada Simpang Bersinyal Studi Kasus Persimpangan Jl. Rajawali – Jl. Hiu Putih Di Kota Palangkaraya,” Basement, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 106-113, 2023.
[13] R. D. Prihantoro, S. Anjarwati dan C. A. N. Sari, “Analisis Kinerja Simpang Tak Bersinyal (Studi Kasus Persimpangan Jalan Perintis Kemerdekaan Banyumas Jawa Tengah),” CIVeng, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 91-96, 2025.
[14] H. E. Prasetyo, A. Setiawan dan A. Pradana, “Kinerja Simpang Empat Tak Berinyal Berdasarkan Derajat Kejenuhan Pada Jalan Raya Mabes Hankam - Jalan Raya Setu, Jakarta Timur,” Kosntruksi, vol. 2, no. 13, pp. 135-145, 2022.
[15] K. P. U. d. P. R. (PUPR), “Pedoman Kapasitas Jalan Indonesia (PKJI),” Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat (PUPR), Jakarta, 2023.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.