DOI : https://doi.org/10.29165/ajarcde.v10i3.1122

Conceptual Review of Urban Molecular Organic Signatures for Environmental Forensics and Net-Zero Transition in Serpong

Rafeyfa Calla Asylacleosa Aisyhafiy (1), Aufa Avanina Aydani (2), Deni Samsudin Permana (3)
(1) MAN Insan Cendekia Serpong, Jl. Cendekia sektor XI BSD, Serpong, tangerang Selatan,
(2) MAN Insan Cendekia Serpong, Jl. Cendekia sektor XI BSD, Serpong, tangerang Selatan,
(3) MAN Insan Cendekia Serpong, Jl. Cendekia sektor XI BSD, Serpong, tangerang Selatan,
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (AJARCDE) :
Aisyhafiy, R. C. A., Aydani, A. A., & Permana, D. S. (2026). Conceptual Review of Urban Molecular Organic Signatures for Environmental Forensics and Net-Zero Transition in Serpong. AJARCDE (Asian Journal of Applied Research for Community Development and Empowerment), 10(3), 460–474. https://doi.org/10.29165/ajarcde.v10i3.1122
Citation Format :

Non-industrial satellite cities in Indonesia are commonly assessed using conventional air-quality indicators, while molecular-level evidence of diffuse urban organic pollution remains poorly synthesized. This conceptual review examines how polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and phthalates may be interpreted as Urban Molecular Signatures (UMS) for future environmental forensic research in Serpong and comparable non-industrial urban areas. A structured narrative-integrative literature review was conducted using peer-reviewed studies on molecular fingerprinting, GC-MS-based organic pollutant analysis, PAH and VOC source attribution, phthalates as markers of domestic and synthetic materials, environmental forensics, urban metabolism, exposome-related frameworks, and Net Zero Emission (NZE) transition literature. The review shows that PAHs, VOCs, and phthalates are well-established indicators of combustion, traffic, solvent use, household activities, synthetic materials, and urban consumption patterns. However, integrated studies combining GC-MS, molecular fingerprinting, environmental forensics, and NZE-related interpretation remain very limited in Indonesia, particularly in non-industrial satellite cities such as Serpong. This paper therefore proposes UMS as a conceptual framework for interpreting mixed patterns of organic pollutants as source-pressure indicators. The framework does not claim that molecular signatures directly determine carbon neutrality or decarbonization pathways. Rather, UMS may complement future emission-inventory and mitigation studies when combined with activity data, emission factors, household behavior, mobility patterns, and policy feasibility analysis. Future research should validate this framework through systematic sampling, GC-MS analysis, diagnostic ratios, multivariate source apportionment, and local emission-activity datasets.


Contribution to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs):
SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities
SDG 15: Life on Land

[1] Gao H, Li H, Lin C, Alvarez PJJ, Masiello CA, Zhu D, et al. Molecular signature of soil organic matter under different land uses in the Lake Chaohu Basin. Eco-Environment and Health 2022;1:212–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eehl.2022.10.003.

[2] Orecchio S, Amorello D, Indelicato R, Barreca S, Orecchio S. A Short Review of Simple Analytical Methods for the Evaluation of PAHs and PAEs as Indoor Pollutants in House Dust Samples. Atmosphere (Basel) 2022;13. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13111799.

[3] Stout SA, Wang Z. Oil Spill Environmental Forensics: Fingerprinting and Source Identification. lsevier; 2016.

[4] Prabhadevi GN, Samad MSA, Jayadev A, Nair DI, Thomas GM, Prasad G. Unveiling Hidden Pollutants: An Environmental Forensics Approach to Water Contamination. Forensic Sciences 2026;6:12. https://doi.org/10.3390/forensicsci6010012.

[5] Lestari P, Damayanti S, Arrohman MK. Emission Inventory of Pollutants (CO, SO 2 , PM 2.5 , and NO X ) In Jakarta Indonesia. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 2020;489:012014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/489/1/012014.

[6] Dong C Di, Chen CF, Chen CW. Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in industrial harbor sediments by GC-MS. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2012;9:2175–88. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9062175.

[7] Ratnaningsih D, Hari W, Esrom H, Jetro S. Identifikasi awal polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) di udara ambien Serpong-Jakarta. Ecolab 2014.

[8] Izzatuljannah H, Zakiah A. Isu Polusi Udara Di Kota Tangerang Selatan. Seminar Karya dan Pameran Arsitektur Indonesia, Jakarta: 2021.

[9] Ravindra K, Sokhi R, Vangrieken R. Atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Source attribution, emission factors and regulation. Atmos Environ 2008;42:2895–921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.12.010.

[10] Rogge WF, Mazurek MA, Hildemann LM, Cass GR, Simoneit BRT. Quantification of urban organic aerosols at a molecular level: Identification, abundance and seasonal variation. Atmospheric Environment Part A General Topics 1993;27:1309–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(93)90257-Y.

[11] Yunker MB, Macdonald RW, Vingarzan R, Mitchell RH, Goyette D, Sylvestre S. PAHs in the Fraser River basin: a critical appraisal of PAH ratios as indicators of PAH source and composition. Org Geochem 2002;33:489–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6380(02)00002-5.

[12] Tobiszewski M, Namie?nik J. PAH diagnostic ratios for the identification of pollution emission sources. Environmental Pollution 2012;162:110–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.10.025.

[13] Monod A, Sive BC, Avino P, Chen T, Blake DR, Sherwood Rowland F. Monoaromatic compounds in ambient air of various cities: a focus on correlations between the xylenes and ethylbenzene. Atmos Environ 2001;35:135–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00274-0.

[14] Atkinson R, Arey J. Atmospheric Degradation of Volatile Organic Compounds. Chem Rev 2003;103:4605–38. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr0206420.

[15] Nelson PF, Quigley SM. The ,. A technique for estimating hydrocarbon age in ambient atmospheres. Atmospheric Environment (1967) 1983;17:659–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(83)90141-5.

[16] Weschler CJ. Changes in indoor pollutants since the 1950s. Atmos Environ 2009;43:153–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.044.

[17] Fu J, Lee W-N, Coleman C, Nowack K, Carter J, Huang C-H. Removal of disinfection byproduct (DBP) precursors in water by two-stage biofiltration treatment. Water Res 2017;123:224–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.06.073.

[18] Bundy JG, Davey MP, Viant MR. Environmental metabolomics: a critical review and future perspectives. Metabolomics 2009;5:3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-008-0152-0.

[19] Miller GW, Jones DP. The Nature of Nurture: Refining the Definition of the Exposome. Toxicological Sciences 2014;137:1–2. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kft251.

[20] Frysinger GS, Gaines RB, Reddy CM. GC × GC--A New Analytical Tool For Environmental Forensics. Environ Forensics 2002;3:27–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/713848318.

[21] Ditzler G, Rosen G, Polikar R. Forensic identification with environmental samples. 2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), IEEE; 2012, p. 1861–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2012.6288265.

[22] Stout SA, Emsbo-Mattingly SD, Douglas GS, Uhler AD, McCarthy KJ. Beyond 16 Priority Pollutant PAHs: A Review of PACs used in Environmental Forensic Chemistry. Polycycl Aromat Compd 2015;35:285–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/10406638.2014.891144.

[23] Indrawati A, Puji Lestari R, Tanti A. Tren Deposisi Amonium di Serpong dan Bandung. Ecolab 2020;14:147–56. https://doi.org/10.20886/jklh.2020.14.2.147-156.

[24] IPCC. Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. 2022.

[25] IPCC. Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. 2023.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.